Saturday, May 14, 2011

Newsweek-CNN’s Fareed Zakaria regularly advising Obama (video)

The signs were there two years ago as we questioned in this post, Obama planning post American world.
Is Obama formulating his foreign policy from a book? A book written by a Muslim from India who believes the U.S. is past its prime and in demise? It sure seems that way. Maybe that is the section he so diligently saved while walking on the tarmac, which appears to be one of the first chapters, possibly Chapter 3 entitled “A Non-Western World?”. ~ Creeping Sharia
Photo: Doug Mills/The New York Times

Confirmation via Huffington Post:

CNN’s Fareed Zakaria admitted on Thursday that he has been having regular discussions with President Obama about national security and foreign policy.
Asked by Eliot Spitzer on Thursday’s “In The Arena” if Obama has been calling him up lately, Zakaria said, “mostly it’s been face-to-face meetings…usually organized by Tom Donilon, the national security adviser.”

He said Obama was spending a lot of time “thinking about the issues of the Arab Spring,” and added, “it’s been a very thoughtful conversation. You know, we’ll see where it goes.”

The complicity of the media has been exposed before, but the disgraced Eliot Spitzer and Fareed Zakaria make no effort to hide their loyalty heading into the 2012 election. Did Zakaria advise Obama to kill Mohmar Gadhafi? Because it wasn’t too long ago Zakaria was pimping Gadhafi in the U.S. (Libya recruited Fareed Zakaria to help Gadhafi’s image in U.S.).

 
Some examples of Zakaria’s advice:

Newsweek-CNN’s Zakaria advised Yale not to publish Mohammad cartoons

Newsweek Editor Declares America #2

Newsweek Cover: Radical Islam a fact of life. Live with it. Or else?

In public statement, TSA lies about the Constitution



by Michael Boldin

Round two of the battle for travel freedom is well underway.

The first round, which garnered national attention in the fall of 2010, focused primarily on the TSA implementing new procedures…pat downs, body scanners….and the public outcry against it….boycotts, protests, calling congress to demand change.

But, as the public response failed to stop the scanners and searches, round two has moved to state legislatures around the country. Most prominently, Texas, where the state house just passed a bill banning TSA searches without probable cause. Click here to read the Tenth Amendment Center’s report on the bill.
This time, the TSA is on the defensive, and published an official statement about the Texas bill on their blog:
What’s our take on the Texas House of Representatives voting to ban the current TSA pat-down? Well, the Supremacy Clause of the U.S. Constitution (Article. VI. Clause 2) prevents states from regulating the federal government.
The problem here? The statement is false. Ignorance from the TSA is unlikely, so I’ll call a spade a spade. They’re lying.

The supremacy clause says nothing of the sort. Here’s the full text:
This Constitution, and the Laws of the United States which shall be made in pursuance thereof; and all treaties made, or which shall be made, under the authority of the United States, shall be the supreme law of the land; and the judges in every state shall be bound thereby, anything in the constitution or laws of any state to the contrary notwithstanding.
So, in simple terms, what does the supremacy clause mean? Just what it says. The constitution is supreme. And any federal laws made in line with the constitution is supreme. Nothing more, nothing less.
Notice there’s not one single word in the actual text that says anything about states regulating the federal government as the TSA claims. They’re just making things up as they go.

SUPREMACY CLAUSE EXAMPLES

In the constitution, The federal government is authorized to establish post offices. So if a state tried to establish their own, which would put it into conflict with the federal post office, the supremacy clause would rule that the state was in the wrong.

On the other hand, the first amendment says, in part, that congress shall not make laws restricting free speech. So, if a state law was established to give extra protection to the free speech rights of people in the state, and the federal government tried to restrict that freedom with an agency action, regulation, or law, the Feds would be in the wrong.

Why? Because the federal law restricting free speech would not be “in pursuance of” the constitution. And, as stated above, it’s the constitution, not all federal laws, which are supreme. The only federal laws which are supreme are constitutional ones.

THE 4TH HASN’T BEEN REPEALED

Federal searches, as the 4th amendment makes clear, have certain requirements. Probable cause is one of them. Here’s the text of the 4th:
The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized
There is no wiggle room here. No warrants shall issue. None. The 4th amendment doesn’t offer any exceptions. Period.

INTERPOSITION

So, when the federal government doesn’t follow such straightforward rules, what should be done? In the Virginia Resolution of 1798, James Madison explained the role of the states in such a situation. He wrote:
That this Assembly doth explicitly and peremptorily declare, that it views the powers of the federal government, as resulting from the compact, to which the states are parties; as limited by the plain sense and intention of the instrument constituting the compact; as no further valid that they are authorized by the grants enumerated in that compact; and that in case of a deliberate, palpable, and dangerous exercise of other powers, not granted by the said compact, the states who are parties thereto, have the right, and are in duty bound, to interpose for arresting the progress of the evil, and for maintaining within their respective limits, the authorities, rights and liberties appertaining to them. [emphasis added]
So, when the federal government violates your rights by refusing to abide by the limits put on it in the constitution, it’s you state’s duty to stand up and do it instead.

The verdict? Texas is in the right, and more states should join in now. The TSA…not even close.

*******

What’s the next lie that the TSA will tell us? Not sure, but from this one, it might be something just as absurd, like…”the 1st amendment says that states can’t interfere with TSA restrictions on complaints during wartime.”

The kicker here is that under the founders’ vision for the constitution – where the federal government is authorized to exercise only those powers delegated to it….and nothing more – the TSA wouldn’t even exist. For an unconstitutional agency to lie about Constitutional matters is beyond absurd, and it must be stopped. Other states are considering bills like in Texas – and sources close to the Tenth Amendment Center tell us to expect at least 10 or more to do so in 2012.

For a more detailed explanation of the supremacy clause, along with some historical perspective from the founding era, read Professor Brion McClanahan’s article, Who’s Supreme? The Supremacy Clause Smackdown.

Michael Boldin [send him email] is the founder of the Tenth Amendment Center. He was raised in Milwaukee, WI, and currently resides in Los Angeles, CA. Follow him on twitter - @michaelboldin - and visit his personal blog - http://www.michaelboldin.com/

A Templars Mission (as our own)

The World has entered a new phase in human history with Moslem’s soldiers on the march across the entire Globe, seeking to conquer our lands and take our civilized World back into the ‘Dark Ages’ under the suppressive dark demonic force of Islam.

The call… for Holy war against non-Moslem’s has gone out to the entire Islamic world and is being answered with Moslem’s around the world uniting as a global ‘Islamic Religious army’, rising up against the entire non-Moslem world.

They are seeking for the total destruction of our Judeo/Christian way of life so that they can enforce Allah’s will – ‘Islam’ upon the World. Their aim is to conquer our lands, enforce Islamic Law (Sharia law) upon our Nations and take our wives and children as their ‘spoils of war’.  

France where the founding fathers of the Knights Templar’s arose from is in a state of civil strife with Moslem’s encamped within their land rising up seeking to dominate the landscape of this part of Europe.

People commenting on the situation in France have called it a civil war or ‘intifada’ (uprising).  The darkness from Hell in the embodiment of Islam casts a heinous shadow across the entire globe. It is now time for us the civilized people of this world to stand up and let the light that shines in us and upon our lands shine brightly through us the non-Moslem people of the world and stamp out that darkness that engulfs our way of life and our futures.  

Our lands, our wives and our children need protecting from the invading Moslem armies encamped upon our shores. Now is the time to look up, humble ourselves and pray calling out to Our God for help and protection for the days that lay ahead. He is the only one who can hold back the dark murderous shadow of Islam that engulfs us all.  

I pray that now will be the start, that those who know they have been chosen by God will arise from amongst the people so we can stand together and that those not yet called will accept and embrace the call when it comes.  

We die together as Christian brothers and sisters in protection of the Christian and Jewish world, for the future of our people.   In service of the King – Jesus – The Lion of the Tribe of Judah.

Friday, May 13, 2011

Tiny Helmet Cameras on 25 SEALS Captured Entire 40-Minute OBL Raid



CBS reports:
WASHINGTON – A new picture emerged Thursday of what really happened the night the Navy SEALs swooped in on Osama bin Laden’s compound in Pakistan.

CBS News national security correspondent David Martin reports the 40 minutes it took to kill bin Laden and scoop his archives into garbage bags were all recorded by tiny helmet cameras worn by each of the 25 SEALs.

Officials reviewing those videos are still reconstructing a more accurate version of what happened. We now know that the only firefight took place in the guest house, where one of bin Laden’s couriers opened fire and was quickly gunned down. No one in the main building got off a shot or was even armed, although there were weapons nearby.

The SEALs first saw bin Laden when he came out on the third floor landing. They fired, but missed. He retreated to his bedroom, and the first SEAL through the door grabbed bin Laden’s daughters and pulled them aside.

When the second SEAL entered, bin Laden’s wife rushed forward at him — or perhaps was pushed by bin Laden. The SEAL shoved her aside and shot bin Laden in the chest. A third seal shot him in the head.

The top Democrat on the House Intelligence Committee went to CIA headquarters Thursday to view photos the SEALs took of bin Laden’s body.


http://www.theblaze.com/stories/seal-cameras-recorded-entire-obl-raid-cia-chief-previously-spoke-of-25-minute-blackout/

Thursday, May 12, 2011

No bail for man in attempted cockpit entry

AP
In this image captured by citizen journalist Andrew Wai, passengers, top right, subdue a man identified as Rageh Almurisi (not seen) on board an Ameri AP – In this image captured by citizen journalist Andrew Wai, passengers, top right, subdue a man identified …
SAN FRANCISCO – A Yemen native who disrupted a San Francisco-bound flight was portrayed by prosecutors Tuesday as a dangerous and erratic passenger who tried to barge into the cockpit twice, did not carry any luggage and yelled "God is great" in Arabic.

Assistant U.S. Attorney Elise Becker said Rageh Al-Murisi, 28, was carrying several valid and expired forms of identification from New York and California, $47 in cash and two postdated checks totaling $13,000 in his wallet. One check was made out to himself, she said, but did not specify where the other was from.
She also said he didn't tell his relatives in California that he was traveling there.

Al-Murisi faces one count of interfering with flight crew members and attendants as pilots on American Airlines Flight 1561 were preparing to land in San Francisco on Sunday, one week after the death of Osama bin Laden at the hands of the U.S. military that has raised fears of a possible retaliation.

"He attempted to enter the cockpit right before a critical part of the flight," Becker said in prosecution arguments to withhold bail for Al-Murisi.

In the court affidavit filed Monday, air marshal Paul Howard said after being told the cockpit door wasn't the restroom, Al-Murisi made eye contact with a crew member, lowered his shoulder and rammed the door. The crew member told Howard he then got between Al-Murisi and the door, but Al-Murisi kept yelling and pushing forward in an attempt to open it, according to the affidavit.

Court documents say Al-Murisi repeatedly yelled "Allahu Akbar," or Arabic for "God is great," and tried twice to open the cockpit door before being subdued by a crew member and several passengers, including a former Secret Service agent and retired San Mateo police officer Larry Wright. The flight landed safely at San Francisco International Airport, but not without frightening passengers who became alarmed as he yelled unintelligibly and tried to rush the cockpit.

Becker said that the same Arabic phrase was uttered by the hijackers of Flight 93 as they took over the plane that eventually went down in Shanksville, Pa., on Sept. 11, 2001, and by a Nigerian man who allegedly tried to detonate explosives in his underwear on a Detroit-bound flight on Christmas 2009.

Wright said Tuesday that he jumped out of his seat after he heard a scream and Al-Murisi trotted past him yelling "Allahu Akbar." The man was tackled, and Wright put Al-Murisi in a "control hold" as others tied his arms and legs in plastic handcuffs, he said.

"I felt he was trying to take on the flight crew and possibly try to crash the airplane," he said.
The man screamed "Allahu Akbar" at least 30 times while in custody, he added.

Al-Murisi's lawyer, Assistant Federal Public Defender Elizabeth Falk, argued that her client was not a public danger, but Judge James Larson disagreed and denied bail. He planned to revisit the issue on Friday.

Authorities have said Al-Murisi has no clear or known ties to terrorism and investigators have not established a possible motive. He was not on any terror watch list, according to a U.S. official briefed on the investigation who spoke on condition of anonymity because the probe is ongoing.

Yemen, a nation at the southern tip of the Arabian peninsula, has been a focus of U.S. officials because one of the most active branches of al-Qaida operates in the remote part of the country. Al-Murisi's wife and children live in Yemen, Becker said.

His cousin, Ahmed Almoraissi, described the passenger as a "normal guy" who taught math in Yemen.
"He has no intention of hurting nobody," he said. "I don't know what happened on the plane. It doesn't make sense."

Officials say he had been living in the San Francisco suburb of Vallejo until moving recently to join his brother in New York. He was unable to find work in Vallejo, a town of 100,000 across the bay from San Francisco hit hard by the real estate bust, said another cousin of Al-Murisi.

Rageh Almoraissi said his cousin did not show an interest in politics and was not intensely religious.
___
Associated Press writer Eileen Sullivan in Washington, D.C., contributed to this story.


http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/us_flight_disturbance;_ylt=AtaHBsVzeXL65hWpI5VrQ6Os0NUE;_ylu=X3oDMTNwYTltMWZrBGFzc2V0A2FwLzIwMTEwNTEwL3VzX2ZsaWdodF9kaXN0dXJiYW5jZQRjY29kZQNtb3N0cG9wdWxhcgRjcG9zAzYEcG9zAzMEcHQDaG9tZV9jb2tlBHNlYwN5bl9oZWFkbGluZV9saXN0BHNsawNub2JhaWxmb3JtYW4

Momentum builds in al Qaeda funding litigation

REUTERS
5/10/2011


(An earlier version of this story incorrectly stated that Sudan is the only government still included in the case. Iran is also included. The version also said the U.S. government has asserted that the defendants continue to provide funding to al Qaeda. The assertion applies to only some of the defendants.)


NEW YORK, May 10 (Reuters) - Osama bin Laden is dead, but the search for al Qaeda's funding sources is only now starting to gain momentum.

Litigation brought by victims of the Sept. 11 attacks was consolidated in U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York in 2003. It has been slowed by the deaths of two presiding judges and by motions that have eliminated scores of foreign governments, banks, and purported terrorist fronts as defendants.

Now, almost a decade after the attacks, lawyers for family members of Sept. 11 victims have finally begun to gather evidence directly from groups they accuse of financing al Qaeda. U.S. District Judge George Daniels last October authorized the victims' lawyers to start collecting financial records and other evidence from such groups as the International Islamic Relief Organization, the Muslim World League, the World Assembly of Muslim Youth, and the al-Haramain USA Foundation. The U.S. government has cited all those groups as conduits of al Qaeda funding.

"The cost of maintaining a global infrastructure to support acts of terror is massive," said Sean Carter of Cozen O'Connor, whose firm represents insurance companies and other commercial plaintiffs. "Al Qaeda relied on such a global infrastructure to plan, coordinate, and execute its acts."

Carter said lawyers for the victims have demanded not only records of the defendants' finances -- including their sources of funding and outgoing payments -- but also all records of their relationships with alleged al Qaeda associates. The deadline for the groups to turn over such materials is August. Plaintiffs lawyers said they also plan to depose officials from the defendant organizations beginning this summer. A trial date could be as early as 2012.


STILL FUNDING AL QAEDA

According to Carter and other victims' lawyers, including Robert Haefele of Motley Rice and James Kreindler of Kreindler & Kreindler, the U.S. government has asserted as recently as 2009 that some of the remaining defendants in their civil cases continue to provide financial support to al Qaeda and the Taliban.
Diplomatic dispatches released by Wikileaks support that assertion. In a memo about Saudi Arabia's efforts to restrict the flow of funds from Saudi-based charities, a State Department official wrote that Riyadh had failed to cut off funds from multilateral organizations such as the International Islamic Relief Organization, Muslim World League, and the World Assembly of Muslim Youth. "Intelligence suggests that these groups continue to send money overseas and, at times, fund extremism overseas," the memo, dated Dec. 28, 2009, said.

Osama bin Laden's death will have little effect on the litigation, according to lawyers for both the victims and for bin Laden family interests. Allegations against a company controlled by bin Laden's family, the Mohammed bin Laden Co, have already been dismissed, as have allegations against several of bin Laden's relatives. A motion to dismiss the allegations against another company controlled by the bin Laden family, Saudi bin Laden Group, is pending before Judge Daniels.

An attorney for the bin Laden family entities, James Gauch of Jones Day, said the businesses have no ties to the financing of terrorism. "The plaintiffs' lawyers won't accept that," Gauch said. The family expelled Osama bin Laden from the businesses in the early 1990s, and yet victims' lawyers "keep trying to make the allegation that the expulsion wasn't real," Gauch said.


EXCEPT SUDAN AND IRAN, FOREIGN GOVERNMENTS DISMISSED

Only a dozen defendants remain of the 300 originally named by lawyers for the victims.
Most of the foreign governments and officials, including Saudi Arabia and Iraq, were dismissed from the litigation because foreign governments have broad protection from civil liability in U.S. courts. Sudan and Iran, however, remain defendants in the case. If southern Sudan splits from the north, after voting to secede in February, plaintiffs' lawyers may be able to obtain additional information about Sudan's alleged financial sponsorship of terrorism, said victims' counsel Kreindler.

Also still in the case is the Dubai Islamic Bank. Several other banks, including Arab Bank and National Commercial Bank, and Saudi American Bank were dismissed.

The International Islamic Relief Organization and the Muslim World League are represented in the funding litigation by Martin McMahon of McMahon and Associates, who did not return a call for comment. Nor did counsel for the World Assembly of Muslim Youth, Omar Mohammedi of O'Bryan Baun Karamanian. Alan Kabat, who represents al-Haramain USA, said his client disputes allegations of helping to fund terrorism. "We look forward to showing there's no proof of that at the summary judgment stage," he said.

The case is in Re: Terrorist Attacks on Sept. 11, 2001, U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, No. 03-MD-1570.

(Reporting by Alison Frankel)

The Bullied Nation


When Obama inaugurated a conference on bullying by announcing that he too had been bullied, he made the one confession that no world leader should ever make. At least not a world leader who ever hopes to be taken seriously. But by this time it was doubtful that there was a world leader who didn't know that Obama could be bullied. Many of them had been rather successful at bullying him already.

The goal of the conference, according to Obama, was to dispel the myth that bullying is "an inevitable part of growing up". But of course it is an inevitable part of growing up. And of being grown up too. If you don't learn how to handle bullies while growing up, you'll have to learn those same lessons later on in life.

We may grow up, but we never entirely leave who we were behind. The bullies will always be with us. Their bullying may become more sophisticated, but the old dynamic never really goes away.

When Obama spent half his correspondents dinner taunting Trump, it was a sight you could easily see in any school cafeteria. The difference is that he chose to do it in a forum where he had no fear of being answered back, using lines written for him by a writer from the Daily Show. It was bullying of the cowardly sort. Which just goes to show you that some of the bullied, harbor a secret wish to be bullies themselves. But when they get the chance to be bullies, they still practice it in a cowardly way.

Compare Bush's willingness to laugh at himself in a double act with Colbert at that same dinner years earlier, to Obama taunting his rivals when they're prevented by decorum from answering back. Just as he did to Paul Ryan. This is how a man who can dish it out, and can't take it, acts. And that's the difference between a man and an insecure child who never really grew up, whose emotional compass is still tethered to his childhood memories. Who still dreams of repaying minor slights and takes every criticism personally.

Obama may hold conferences on bullying, but he is the worst sort of bully, too cowardly to do it without a lot of protectors and plausible deniability standing between him and his targets. How many Republican car dealerships were targeted under O's car company regime, and what about the pass given to the New Black Panther party's voter intimidation tactics, or launching Operation Rushbo against one of his more vocal critics. Or using 'teabaggers' to describe his opponents. To say nothing of the thuggishness by teachers in Wisconsin. Strip away the billion dollar political machine and you're left with something that looks a lot like High School.

The obsession with childhood bullying is another misguided application of social engineering to children. Obama may speak of creating "an atmosphere at school where children feel safe". But no amount of government intervention can prevent kids from being bullied. And no government officials can teach them to stand up for themselves. Children and teenagers have their own culture apart from adults, and no matter how many bureaucrats poke and pry into their lives, they can never find their way inside. Instead of protecting them against bullies, the injection of bureaucracy becomes its own form of bullying.

After the Columbine Massacre, all the conferences on bullying yielded a Zero Tolerance madness that criminalized everything from toy soldiers to plastic knives to playing cops and robbers. Six year old cub scouts have been suspended for bringing camping equipment to school. Arrests have been made for shooting rubber bands. Advil and Midol have become controlled substances. An 11 year old was suspended because the chain on her Tweety bird wallet was found to be long enough to qualify as a weapon. Another 11 year old died because zero tolerance policies prevented him from carrying an inhaler. A National Merit Scholar was arrested and expelled because she had misplaced a kitchen knife on the floor of her car.

There will be no conferences held on this type of bullying, because it is practiced by the conference attendees, the school bureaucrats and teachers, and the public officials who enable them, against the children placed in their care. And their only solution to every problem is more of the same. More bureaucracy and more regulations. It is a form of bullying that most Americans have become terribly familiar with. And it is worse than any ordinary bullying, because while you can stand up to an ordinary bully, defying the government bureaucracy at every level is much harder.

As go the schools, so goes a nanny state in which everyone is treated like children. Subjected to constant regulation and supervision. Treated like incompetent wards of the state who need to be told what to do at all times. The cradle to grave state treats those at the grave, much as it does at the cradle, as nuisances who need to be brought into conformity with paragraph 19, section 32, subsection 92B of their marching orders circa this week. American history is the story of people who tried to escape the governments that were making them miserable, only for the bureaucrats to make it over anyway.

The nanny state promises that we will no longer be bullied by big business, and then gets down to the job of bullying us so thoroughly and relentlessly that the only escape is death. And not even then. For dying doesn't free you of the tangle of laws and regulations. It just puts your conscious mind beyond their reach. Like the protagonist of 'Brazil' your soul may escape, but your body is left behind under their authority.

Obama's promise of a safe atmosphere for every student reeks of the same thing. A paranoid hothouse in which a wrong word, a wrong look or a wrong implication can result in criminal prosecution under a new wave of Zero Tolerance enforcement. This vision of PS Stalag 17 is being realized not just in schools, but everywhere. The EUSSR has its political prisoners, and so will we, as any hindrance to public order becomes a crime. Bad ideas are held responsible for causing violence. The logic of Crimethink that arrests students for having something that is not a weapon, but has some common conceptual resemblance to one, dictates that a bullseye on a political map is the same thing as an assassination plot.

In the name of maintaining that hothouse atmosphere, independent traits or atavistic behaviors must be rooted out. The only properly safe nation is one in which all the people are sheep, and the guns are in the hands of the ranchers and the wolves. But from a sheep's perspective, the only difference between the ranchers and the wolves, is that the ranchers keep them alive longer than the wolves. Once the wolves come or the ranchers grow tired of them, the sheep have no survival skills left. Those were wiped out in order to keep a safe atmosphere for the herd.

European newspapers frowning at the sight of Americans loudly celebrating the end of Bin Laden posit that Americans and Europeans have different values. But it's not so much a matter of different values, as of different governments. European governments have built their stifling nanny states and declared many normal human behaviors to be against their values. But their ancestors would have taken issue with such a characterization of European values. As would the Italians who spat on Mussolini's upside down dangling corpse. American values are individualistic. And though the chains of political correctness creep over their shoulders, they still react like free men and women, rather than children afraid of being taken to task by their elders.

The new European values say that violence is bad regardless of its attribution. That only savages kill and relish a victory over an enemy. But when the traits of the fighter and the warrior are rooted out, then you are left with a nation of sheep. Ready for the taking. Europe has made itself safe enough to attract a southern and eastern breed of wolf. Lupine immigrants whose values are genuinely atavistic and who eagerly feed on nations of sheep.

That is the problem with locking up combative instincts and confiscating guns. Sooner or later you will need them. The world is not a hothouse, it is an ongoing struggle for land, life and resources. Countries do not exist because the UN mandated it, but because their people fought and died to make it so. Teach the people to be sheep, and the countries will not long survive their first encounter with the wolves. The American violent now atavism frowned on by the elites of the EUSSR is what stood between them and the wolves. It may end up doing that again before another centuries comes to its end.

The hue and cry over bullying carries an echo of that same fussiness. A philosophy in denial about human nature. Every defense against oppression ultimately becomes its own force of oppression. Books of regulations can be a far more ruthless form of oppression than a punch in the face. And a bureaucracy charged with rooting out modes of behavior quickly becomes the worst bully of all.

But the real danger of such a system is the learned helplessness that it teaches. When you are taught that it is better to submit than to fight, better to come over to the other point of view than stand up for your own, and better to be agreeable than make a fuss no matter what is being done to you-- then you are being taught to be a victim. People who think this way cannot be members of a free society, only frightened people looking for someone to protect them. They are victims looking for a predator. And a society of victims will attract predators.

The editor of the French left wing paper, Libération, wrote of "this base, uncomfortable joy, unprecedented in a democracy, that blew yesterday over the streets of New York." But such joy is rooted in democracy. The French ought to know that better than anyone else. Or has Monsieur Demorand completely forgotten the words of his own national anthem, that speaks of triumphantly watering the fields of France with the "impure blood" of her enemies. Freedom, national and personal freedom, is fought for by men and women who are not only willing to die for it, but are willing to kill for it. Not with the mechanical distance of bomber pilots, but the violent passion of human beings who refuse to submit to their enemies.

No democracy will survive for long without that "uncomfortable joy". It will either be consumed by the wolves from without or from within. The hothouse society is a nation of wimps. Easily bullied, always looking to some authority, some international law for its protection. When it is struck, then it takes refuge in its own moral superiority for not resorting to violence. Eventually it forgets how to hate and remembers only how to fear.

For a nation not to be bullied, its people must know how to stand up to bullies. Not to go along with them. Not how to understand their point of view. Or how to run and tell someone in authority about them. But how to fight back against them and win.


http://sultanknish.blogspot.com/2011/05/bullied-nation.html?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+FromNyToIsraelSultanRevealsTheStoriesBehindTheNews+%28from+NY+to+Israel+Sultan+Reveals+The+Stories+Behind+the+News%29