Showing posts with label pro sharia. Show all posts
Showing posts with label pro sharia. Show all posts

Wednesday, September 21, 2011

Analysis:Claiming injustice, Libya Islamists push political role


TRIPOLI (Reuters) - Using organizational skills honed over decades in the opposition underground, Islamists are carving out a place in Libyan postwar politics more rapidly than other former dissidents preparing for a hoped-for future of pluralism.

Islamist spokesmen have won prominence by complaining on Arab satellite television channels that veteran advocates of Islamic rule are largely shut out from the North African country's interim administration and its official media.

They argue that Libya's unelected caretaker administration known as the National Transitional Council (NTC), is keeping Islamic groups at arm's length and dominating the political stage to please Western powers worried about militant Islam following the toppling of Muammar Gaddafi, an avowed foe of Islamism.

"The Libyan people have been underground. No Libyan had the chance of exposure. Now we see the NTC come and take the spotlight," Mohamed Abdul Malek, a senior official of the Libyan Muslim Brotherhood, the country's main Islamist organization, told Reuters.

The Islamists' adroitness in using the international media to grab some of the attention they say they have been denied at home is not surprising, say analysts.

Gaddafi's fall and the disappearance of his secret police have made possible the exercise of pent-up political energies long suppressed during 42 years of what Islamists call Gaddafi's megalomania -- activists are now free to work hard to get their message out, they say.

Away from the headlines, the backroom work of forming alliances, discussing manifestos and priorities and learning the art of writing press releases has quickened, say Islamist activists hurrying between meetings in Tripoli's hotels.

Other secularist parties outside of the interim administration appear to be much less skilled in these political arts because Gaddafi banned both political parties and elections, and so there is a void of experience, Libyans say.

ISLAMISTS' FUNDING, POPULARITY IN FOCUS

The Islamists' voluble complaints are not an indication that Libya, now awash with weapons, is condemned to suffer a dangerous ideological contest between secularist and Islamist forces, analysts say.

Many Libyans now own powerful assault rifles or handguns, thanks to the chaos of the conflict, and no official program is so far in place for post-conflict disarmament.

Whether political parties including Islamists cooperate willingly in a future demand by government for the disarming of society -- including political party members with weapons -- remains to be seen.

Most Islamist groups have been careful to say they want a "civil state" with democracy, language that avoids antagonizing secularists who want to keep religion separate from the state.

In a Reuters interview, a prominent Islamist, Tripoli military commander Abdel Hakim Belhadj, called Gaddafi's overthrow a "popular revolution," avoiding any religious terminology.

And in any case, factors such as regionalism and tribal affiliation loom just as large in Libyan politics.
But the Islamists' rise to prominence has stirred curiosity about the extent of their popularity and their sources of funding, and focused Western minds on a related security question of how to protect Libya from al Qaeda's violent anti-Western strain of Islamism.

Malek, the Brotherhood official in charge of ties with the West, suggested in an interview that NTC leaders had been high-handed in their dealings with his colleagues and forgotten that they were only a temporary administration pending democratic elections.

"Islamists, liberals, socialists, communists, whoever, as long as they are Libyans, they have the right to act for the future of Libya through a democratic process. But they have been trying to keep us away. They have been using a policy of exclusion just like Gaddafi," he said.

"We would like to sit down with them and with anyone and try to work out a program where we can all participate but within an atmosphere of democracy and inclusion."

Asked to give an example of the NTC exceeding its mandate, Malek noted that the de facto president, NTC chairman Mustafa Abdel Jalil, said in a speech in Tripoli this month that Islamic sharia law should be the main basis of legislation in post-Gaddafi Libya.

"I agree with him wholeheartedly,. There is nothing dearer to me than to see sharia law implemented in Libya," said Malek, adding he respected Jalil and believed he was honest and sincere.

But, he said, "Even though I agree with him, I think it is not up to him to say that. I think he should have said that he would like to see sharia law being implemented.

"Why I want that is because I don't want anyone coming and saying sharia law has been imposed upon us. I think it should be chosen by the people."

ISLAMISTS HIT BY REPRESSION

There was no immediate comment from the NTC. But its officials have responded to previous such criticism by saying that now Gaddafi is gone Libyans have the right to express opinions.
Islamist irritation is not hard to understand.

Gaddafi called Islamists "heretics" and worked energetically to silence them. Hundreds, if not thousands, were jailed, and an unknown number were executed.

In 1987 Gaddafi authorized state television to broadcast the hanging of six suspected Islamists in front of a crowd at a sports stadium.

At the same time, Libyans say, Gaddafi revolted many of his fellow citizens by cloaking his politics in religiosity.

In 1976, Mohammad Hassan, a musician favored by Gaddafi, wrote a song in which he called Gaddafi "Messenger of the Arabian Desert," drawing a parallel between him and the Prophet Mohammed, according to a 1996 article in Middle East Quarterly by Libyan historian and opposition activist Mohammed elJahmi.
In 1970, Gaddafi founded Libya's Islamic Call Society (Jam"iyat ad-Da"wa al-Islamiya), an institution whose mandate was to proselytize in Africa and elsewhere.

In the late 1970s, the group was placed under the supervision of the Libyan External Security Organization, Gaddafi's foreign intelligence service, where its role was expanded to include subversion and propaganda, ElJahmi wrote.

In the 1980s and 1990s, a variety of armed Islamist groups tried and failed to topple Gaddafi.
And in the 2011 war that finally ousted the strongman, Islamist fighters fought in guerrilla groups that played important roles in the taking of Tripoli and other major towns.

MORAL ARGUMENT FOR INCLUSION

This history gives Libyan Islamists a strong moral argument for inclusion in shaping the post-Gaddafi political landscape, Islamist activists say.

"Islamists will be a very important factor in a post-Gaddafi Libya because they have support on the ground and a long history in opposing the old regime," said Omar Ashour, a lecturer in North African politics at Britain's Exeter University.

He said that the Brotherhood, which has been active in Libya at least since the 1950s, and Libyans affiliated to the now defunct Islamic Martyrs Movement of Benghazi, and to a leading family in its leadership, the el-Hami, remained respected and influential.

Malek said that from the outset of the NTC's existence in February and March, it "had excluded the Muslim Brotherhood, even through the Brotherhood members were in every local council of the major cities of Libya."

Mohamed Salem al-Omaish, a co-founder of the February 17 Movement that helped foment the uprising against Gaddafi and also an activist in the affiliated al-Etilaf movement in Tripoli, said the NTC should be "inclusive" and refrain from dictating the output of its official media.

The February 17 members have criticized the presence in the NTC of secularists and technocrats and former Gaddafi officials, suggesting they are Libya's old guard.

The Brotherhood's Malek said that there was "a debate within our ranks at the moment about how to compete in the future."

The movement might become a political party or might create an affiliated party outside its own ranks, he said. But he said it was important to note that the Brotherhood had practiced internal democratic elections for many years.

"I believe that we are the biggest organized group in Libya. But we are not very large (in membership). We do have a larger following within the Libyan people who are not members."


FROM: http://news.yahoo.com/analysis-claiming-injustice-libya-islamists-push-political-role-144258809.html

Monday, June 27, 2011

Qatari Investors: Huge Downtown Development Project Must Conform to Shariah


The New York Times' profile of the CityCenterDC project has mostly nothing new in it if you've been following the huge downtown project at all. But it does include this fascinating nugget about the requirements of its Qatari investors:
Even before the Qatari investors became involved, Hines and Archstone determined that leasing to banks would not help them create lively shopping streets, Mr. Alsup said. But as it happened, their hesitancy on bank branches meshed with the policies of their financial partners, who adhere to the restrictions of Shariah, or Islamic law, including the ban on collecting interest. Restaurants will be able to serve liquor, but retailers whose primary business involves selling alcohol will not be allowed, Mr. Alsup said.
In their marketing materials, Hines and Archstone say they intend to provide “an authentic place for urban residents to socialize outside their homes.”
So, no bars or banks for the biggest downtown construction project in recent memory! As Bill Alsup alluded to, banks aren't all that great for a city streetscape, and it's admirable that they planned to forego such a dependable and high-rent-paying tenant. It's less advantageous, though, to not have business devoted primarily to selling alcohol. CityCenterDC is unlikely to be plagued by liquor stores, but it could definitely use a few places to be out at night drinking without getting a full dinner. Could Qatari money turn CityCenterDC into more of a black hole than the last piece of the puzzle in a living downtown?

(Also, I'm really sick of seeing the word "authentic" used in marketing and branding materials—and using it for a brand-new commercial development is particularly meaningless).

(Also I'm thinking about looking into this further—if you've heard any other examples of investors having moral or religious stipulations for the things they fund, drop me a line).

Thursday, June 23, 2011

California: Slaves to Allah Schooled to Manipulate Government and Media

 


The Muslim Public Affairs Council (MPAC) which just recently held a conference on Capitol Hill to speak out against anti-Sharia legislation, has teamed up with the Islamic Center of San Gabriel Valley in Southern California. They have put forth a combined effort to train Muslims to manipulate our government and media.
Last week, MPAC Senior Adviser Dr. Maher Hathout and Director of Policy & Programming Edina Lekovic conducted a powerful workshop called “Truth Over Fear: Countering Islamophobia” for more than 75 members of the Islamic Center of San Gabriel Valley in Southern California.
“Truth Over Fear” is a workshop and training session developed by MPAC to empower local communities with crucial tools to counter Islamophobia in a proactive and constructive manner. These hands-on training sessions are composed of two primary components: education and hands-on empowerment.
Participants learn how media propaganda produced by a cottage industry of self-proclaimed terrorism experts fuels Islamophobia and dehumanization, and they gain practical tools for addressing the irrational fear of Islam and Muslims that nearly half of Americans admit to having.
They also learned how to effectively engage their elected officials and government representatives, as well as with local and national media outlets.
Through this national campaign, MPAC seeks to inform our country on the dangers that Islamophobia presents to all Americans. The training sessions are meant to raise a proactive voice to counter hate and bigotry, which if left unchecked, can erode the very foundations of our democratic institutions.
Actually, not speaking out against Islam is a danger to non-Muslim Americans. The training sessions were meant to teach Muslims how to get Islam accepted into America. If the hate and bigotry that stems from Islam is left unchecked, it will erode the very foundations of our democratic institutions. That’s the truth! As I have been saying, we are in the middle of a massive information war. PLEASE do your part!

Link to Article