Showing posts with label terrorist cell. Show all posts
Showing posts with label terrorist cell. Show all posts

Sunday, October 9, 2011

200 suicide bombers 'planning attacks in UK'

From: telegraph

 

At least 200 potential terrorists are actively planning suicide attacks while living freely in Britain, intelligence chiefs have warned ministers.

200 suicide bombers 'planning attacks in UK'
Court artist's impression of Irfan Nasser, left, and Irfan Khalid, right, who were
arrested over an alleged UK suicide bombing plot Photo: PA
 
A senior intelligence source has revealed that the figure is a "conservative" estimate of the threat facing the country from UK-based Islamist suicide bombers.
The would-be killers are among 2,000 extremists who the security services have said are based in Britain and actively planning terrorist activity of some kind.
The figures are contained within a secret government report on the "enduring terrorist threat" facing the UK from al-Qaeda and affiliated organisations, The Sunday Telegraph has been told.
While the deaths of Osama bin Laden and Anwar al-Awlaki may have left al-Qaeda without a charismatic leader, both the Secret Intelligence Service, MI6, and the Security Service, MI5, believe the organisation remains as dangerous as ever.
The warning comes as Britain begins preparations for next year's 2012 Olympic Games, which has been described by MI5 as the biggest security operation in the country's history.
But senior sources believe that rather than targeting Olympic venues, where security will be extremely high, terrorists will be tempted to attack areas where crowds are likely to congregate such as train stations and public events.

If terrorists were to mount an attack in Britain of the kind seen in other countries, by packing a single explosive vest with hundreds of ball bearings then detonating it in a crowded enclosed area such as a station terminus at rush hour, they could kill up to 120 people according to one explosives expert.

The 200 British residents thought to be planning suicide attacks, either within the UK or overseas, represent one in 10 of the wider group of 2,000 terrorist plotters.

The intelligence source added that suicide bombers would only be stopped by either a "chance encounter" or by an intelligence-led investigation. But he added that if a terrorist cell was properly organised and secure there was very little the authorities could do to prevent an attack.

The latest disclosure follows the arrest of six men from Birmingham who were remanded in custody two weeks ago over an alleged UK suicide bombing plot.

Two of the six, Irfan Nasser and Irfan Khalid, are accused of preparing for an act of terrorism, including travelling to Pakistan for training in terrorism, making a martyrdom video and planning a bombing campaign.

They are also accused of "being concerned in constructing" a home-made explosive device for terrorist acts and stating an intention to be a suicide bomber.

Earlier this year, classified intelligence documents disclosed by the whistle-blowing website WikiLeaks, showed that MI6 officers believed that Britain was facing a wave of suicide attacks from British-based Muslim extremists who had been trained in terrorist camps in Pakistan.

One report quoted an MI6 officer's briefing to US officials in which he said: "The internal threat is growing more dangerous because some extremists are conducting non-lethal training without ever leaving the country.

Should these extremists then decide to become suicide operatives, HMG [Her Majesty's Government] intelligence resources, eavesdropping and surveillance would be hard pressed to find them on any 'radar screen'."

One intelligence official told this newspaper: "We may have only had one 'successful' suicide attack in Britain but the tactic remains an enduring threat. This is a generational problem we are facing. The terrorists are learning all the time and adapting their tactics. They now operate a cell structure and there security is very tight.

"Suicide bombers know the signs we will be looking for. So they don't pray in the moments before an attack, there will be no heavy coats in summer and they are becoming much more security aware. For every countermeasure we develop they create a new 'measure'. They will always be looking for our exposed flank."

Intelligence experts believe that suicide bombers are motivated by a number of factors including politics, religion, poverty, finance and social factors.

Research has shown that they can be drawn from all social strata and can range from the well-educated to the mentally impaired. In Iraq and Afghanistan, young children and women have been recruited, while in London, the 7/7 bombers who killed 52 people and injured hundreds more in four coordinated attacks on the Tube and bus network came from stable backgrounds with close families.

Another classified report, details of which have been passed to this newspaper, stated that suicide attacks had developed as the weapon of choice for al-Qaeda and its supporters because of the level of fear that such attacks can engender.

The report cited examples of past suicide attacks which were perceived by the organisations which mounted them as having produced successful outcomes, such as the Beirut barracks bombing of 1983 which was followed by the withdrawal of US forces from Lebanon.

Monday, May 30, 2011

Terrorist we cannot deport faces new charges

 

The full extent of the danger posed by a Muslim terrorist protected from deportation by the British courts can be disclosed.

Court
British courts have protected the unnamed Muslim terrorist from deportation Photo: PA
Forgery equipment and "high quality" fake documents used in terrorism were discovered by police buried in the back garden of his Manchester home and the man - who cannot be named - is facing a retrial overseas on terror charges.
Italian security services bugged the Tunisian's conversations, found him to have "intricate knowledge of terrorism" and are likely to seek his extradition for a second time, The Sunday Telegraph can disclose.
This newspaper reported exclusively last week how Home Secretary Theresa May's order to keep the man out of Britain because he was a threat to national security had been overturned by judges in the Court of Appeal.
He is accused of playing a key role in a Europe-wide terror cell which recruited Islamic extremists to fight jihad in Iraq and Afghanistan, possibly against British and American forces.
Judges also banned naming the Tunisian - identified in legal documents by the initials MK - who was first extradited from Britain to Italy in 2008 to face terror charges but was acquitted last year.
A senior officer with the Genoa carabinieri special operations unit, one of Italy's main counter-terrorism teams, said MK was the subject of a three year investigation which involved monitoring telephone calls made from Italy to him in England.

"When he was arrested in Manchester a significant amount of material used for forging documents was found in his house and buried in the garden - the forged documents were of a very high quality," said the marshall, who declined to be named.

"We remain convinced he was in touch with people who had contacts in Iraq and Afghanistan with terrorist cells.

"From my experience of him and the investigation he certainly had an intricate and particular knowledge of terrorism but as I say after four years it is difficult to say now if he was dangerous but at the time he was and so that is why we are appealing.''

And an Italian security source said: "During the investigation we bugged some private and public premises and we are now developing transcripts of those Arabic conversations that were bugged.

"Some of those conversations were bugged in the immigration detention facility during the case in court. The latest ones involve MK and we intend to use them as evidence in our appeal."

He said MK was believed to be a "key figure" in the terror organisation which was under investigation.
"MK was eventually convicted of being with false documentation and a number of rubber stamps, false paperwork and items to make forgeries were found in the garden of the house where he was arrested in England.

"We were disappointed that he was acquitted along with the others but we are in the process of appealing that sentence. I strongly believe that at that moment in time MK was a significant terrorist figure," he said.
Italian prosecutors will allege MK was involved in an extremist group inspired by a secret militant branch of the radical international Muslim group Hizb ut-Tahrir.

MK, who is in his 50s, was arrested in a dawn raid by Greater Manchester Police in November 2007, along with 17 other suspects in Italy and other European countries.

Poisons and ignition devices were seized at addresses in a number of northern Italian cities.

MK was acquitted of terrorist charges in a Milan court in July last year but convicted of falsely procuring a document. Because of time spent on remand he did not have to serve a further sentence and was arrested at London City Airport the following month.

Judges ruled he had a right to stay in Britain to appeal against the Home Secretary's decision.
A preliminary hearing in the Italian prosecutors' appeal was heard last week and a full hearing against MK is due to take place at the Corte d'Assise d'Appello in July.

The operation of the Italian legal system means the court can not only overturn MK's acquittal but also convict him of the charges.

Upon any conviction, Italian authorities will apply for a new warrant to extradite MK to Italy from Britain, where they believe he is currently located, although the Home Office refused to discuss his whereabouts.

The development raises significant questions about the British Court of Appeal's handling of MK's case, and whether the Home Office and British security services have liaised adequately with their Italian counterparts.

The appeal judges' ruling made no mention of a possible retrial in the Italian courts. And because it is not known whether MK is under surveillance by MI5 and Special Branch, it is difficult to predict how easily British authorities could trace him if Italy requests his extradition for a second time.

The first extradition of MK took 12 months to complete after his lawyers brought a lengthy appeal under human rights laws. They claimed his removal to Italy would place him in danger of further extradition to Tunisia where he would be at risk of torture and ill-treatment.

A second extradition request would be likely to see MK's lawyers repeating their arguments under the European Convention on Human Rights.

Last night a Tunisian human rights lawyer said the Jasmine Revolution in January, which led to the ousting of the country's long-time dictator President Zine El Abidine Ben Ali, had cleared the way for MK and others to return to Tunisia.

Samir ben Amor, secretary of the Tunisian Association of Political Prisoners, said all political prisoners had been freed and their convictions set aside.

“This is a different country now. He can come back without any risk,” said Mr Ben Amor. “Hundreds of Tunisians in the same position have already come back from England and elsewhere.”

Mr Ben Amor’s statement significantly undermines MK’s claim to the British courts that he would face ill-treatment or persecution if deported from this country.

The Sunday Telegraph knows the identity of MK but has been prevented from disclosing it by the courts because he is an asylum seeker.

He came to Britain in 2001 and lived in Manchester with his wife and daughters. He had earlier been convicted in his absence of terrorist offences by a military court in Tunisia.

But his claim for asylum is likely to be based on being a member of an Islamist party in Tunisia which was banned before the regime was overthrown by this year's popular uprising - meaning it would have no grounds for success.

A Home Office spokesman said: "We do not comment on individual cases, but public protection is the first duty of government and there are strong measures in place to ensure national security."
 
 
 

Sunday, May 29, 2011

Couple guilty of assisting terrorism

 

Hezbollah was to be cash recipient

BY ERICA BLAKE
BLADE STAFF WRITER

Toledoans Hor Akl and his wife, Amera, were caught trying to conceal $200,000 inside a vehicle they had planned to send to Lebanon and the terror group Hezbollah, which is pledged to the destruction of Israel. Toledoans Hor Akl and his wife, Amera, were caught trying to conceal $200,000 inside a vehicle they had planned to send to Lebanon and the terror group Hezbollah, which is pledged to the destruction of Israel. THE BLADE/DAVE ZAPOTOSKY Enlarge | Photo Reprints
Using latex gloves, plastic wrap, and fragrant insect repellent sticks, Hor Akl and his wife, Amera, worked to bundle about $200,000 to conceal it inside a vehicle they planned to ship to Lebanon, an assistant U.S. attorney said Monday.
The money, he added, was headed to a known terrorist group, Hezbollah.

The Toledo couple pleaded guilty in U.S. District Court Monday to charges that they conspired to smuggle money to a terrorist group overseas. As part of their negotiated pleas, each will be sentenced to time in prison.

“Two hundred thousand dollars was the initial installment,” Assistant U.S. Attorney Justin Herdman said, noting that the couple agreed to transport $1 million, of which about $200,000 would be kept by them as a fee.

Hor Akl pleaded guilty to five counts pertaining to conspiracy and interstate commerce in support of terrorism as well as bankruptcy fraud. He could be sentenced to more than seven years in prison.

His wife, Amera Akl, pleaded guilty to one charge of conspiracy to provide material support to a terrorist organization. She faces nearly four years in prison when sentenced.

As part of the plea agreements, an arson charge that would have carried a 10-year prison sentence was dropped against Hor Akl, and two charges, including an arson-related charge, were dropped against his wife.

They each left the Toledo courtroom Monday without comment after the hearing.

The pair were charged in June, 2010, in a 36-page indictment filed in U.S. District Court. It alleged they “did knowingly combine, conspire, and agree” to aid the terrorist group Hezbollah. They are alleged to have sent money and supplies to a foreign terrorist organization beginning on Aug. 30, 2009.

“Money is the lifeblood of terrorist organizations, and stopping the flow is a key component to choking off these organizations,” U.S. Attorney Steven Dettelbach, who is based in Cleveland, said in a prepared statement e-mailed to The Blade.

According to court documents filed in the case, Hor Akl said that he spoke to his wife about transporting funds and that he personally had brought money to Lebanon in previous visits. Court records also indicate that he said he understood that the transported funds would go to “terrorists” targeting Israel.

In March, 2010, Hor Akl returned to Lebanon during which time his wife said she had spoken to her husband and said he would be meeting with a high-level Hezbollah official, court documents said.

The couple were arrested June 3, 2010, after an eight-month federal investigation. According to court documents, a government source entered the Akl residence with $200,000 provided by the FBI. Agents found the couple in their home wearing latex gloves and in possession of the money and automotive accessories, plastic wrap, and duct tape, while they prepared to hide the cash in the accessories.

Recorded conversations

Mr. Herdman said that evidence in the case included recorded conversations as well as details obtained by an informant.

Counts one and two, pertaining to conspiracy and interstate commerce in support of terrorism, named both the husband and his wife.

On counts three, four, and five, Hor Akl was charged with defrauding creditors, making false statements under oath, and fraudulently transferring or concealing property as it related to a bankruptcy filed in August, 2008. Count six, which will be dismissed at sentencing, alleged the two of them collected an insurance claim in early 2002 after allegedly setting a 1998 Jeep Cherokee on fire.

U.S. District Court Judge James Carr, who presided over the plea, noted that as part of the signed plea agreements, he was bound to sentence the couple within agreed upon guidelines. He set Amera Akl’s sentencing for June 20 where she faces between 37 and 46 months.

Hor Akl faces between 70 and 87 months. No sentencing date for him was set.

Because of good time credit allotted in federal prison sentencing, each could serve less time in prison than their sentence. Amera Akl’s Detroit-based attorney, Sanford Schulman, said that the couple’s children will fall under the care of various family members while they are incarcerated. He added that the wife requested an early sentencing date so that she could begin serving her sentence and there would be less time when both parents are behind bars.

Additional details would be worked out at the sentencing, he added.

‘In the same direction’

Judge Carr noted that both defendants had to choose to enter guilty pleas or proceed to trial. He said that per conditions of the agreements, the couple were “bound to proceed in the same direction” and that one could not choose to enter a plea without the other.

Also as part of the deal, the couple would forfeit $7,140.40 as well as a 2004 Chevy Trailblazer, which was to be used to smuggle the cash, according to the indictment.

Prior to entering the plea, Mr. Schulman withdrew a series of motions that had been filed recently. Included was a motion to dismiss the charges “due to outrageous governmental conduct.”

After the hearing, Mr. Schulman said his client’s story was outlined in the 38-page motion, but she chose to enter a plea because “she wanted it over.”

“It was 40 years down to three years. I probably would have taken the deal myself,” he said.

In the motion withdrawn yesterday, Mr. Schulman outlined the months during the investigation. He said there had been no evidence that the couple previously had been involved in “assisting or even associating with a known terrorist organization.”

He added that the government had no need to send an informant to stage a terrorist transaction.

“I don’t know if they caught the bad guy today, but they got what they wanted,” he said.

Attorney David Doughten, who with Jeff Helmick represented Hor Akl, said after the hearing Monday that the plea had been “appropriate” based on the facts of the case.

“He was treated fairly by the government,” Mr. Doughten said. “… It was an accurate plea reflecting the facts of the case.”

The judge allowed the couple to continue living in separate houses on bond, but extended the time they could spend together with their three children to between 9 a.m. and 9 p.m., seven days a week. Both remain on electronic monitoring and an adult custodian must be present at all times.

“This case demonstrates the continued effort by the FBI and our Joint Terrorism Task Forces to deny financing and support to those terrorist organizations that present a threat to the United States,” said Stephen Anthony, special agent in charge of the FBI’s Cleveland Division, in a prepared statement e-mailed to The Blade.

Contact Erica Blake at: eblake@theblade.com or 419-213-2134.

Thursday, April 28, 2011

Federal judge rules terror-linked CAIR, other Muslims can’t see FBI files

via Federal judge rules Muslims can’t see FBI files – Forbes.com.

SANTA ANA, Calif. — A federal judge ruled Wednesday that a group of Muslim activists and organizations cannot review additional records of FBI inquiries into their activities but berated the government for misleading the court about the existence of the files.

U.S. District Judge Cormac J. Carney said six Muslim groups and five individuals who sued in 2007 to gain access to records they believed the FBI was keeping do not have a right to much of the information because of national security concerns.

The ruling came amid a nearly five-year battle by the American Civil Liberties Union and the Muslim activists to obtain files they believe would show the FBI has been unlawfully targeting Muslims in Southern California.

Carney reached his decision after privately reviewing more than 100 pages of documents to ensure the government had complied with Freedom of Information laws in denying access to plaintiffs.


Friday, April 22, 2011

Minnesota: Muslim women urged donors to focus on jihad

Hat tip to Money Jihad via MN Women Face Oct. 3 Trial on Terror Charge | WDAZ

MINNEAPOLIS (AP) — While investigating whether two Rochester women were funneling money to a terror group in Somalia, FBI agents sifted through the trash of an apartment complex roughly 90 times, intercepted and recorded 30,000 phone calls and interviewed suspects more than once.

Details revealed in court Thursday hint at the scope and complexity of the investigation into Amina Farah Ali and Hawo Mohamed Hassan, two women who prosecutors say were part of a “deadly pipeline” routing money and fighters from the U.S. to al-Shabab.

Hawo Mohamed Hassan, left, and Amina Farah Ali

Ali, 34, and Hassan, 60, will face trial Oct. 3 on multiple charges, including conspiracy to provide material support to a foreign terrorist organization. Prosecutors say they went door-to-door to collect funds and held teleconferences to solicit donations. In one of those calls, prosecutors say, Ali told others to “forget about the other charities” and focus on “the Jihad.”