Monday, May 30, 2011

The Arrivals pt.35 (The Temple of Solomon)

Terrorist we cannot deport faces new charges

 

The full extent of the danger posed by a Muslim terrorist protected from deportation by the British courts can be disclosed.

Court
British courts have protected the unnamed Muslim terrorist from deportation Photo: PA
Forgery equipment and "high quality" fake documents used in terrorism were discovered by police buried in the back garden of his Manchester home and the man - who cannot be named - is facing a retrial overseas on terror charges.
Italian security services bugged the Tunisian's conversations, found him to have "intricate knowledge of terrorism" and are likely to seek his extradition for a second time, The Sunday Telegraph can disclose.
This newspaper reported exclusively last week how Home Secretary Theresa May's order to keep the man out of Britain because he was a threat to national security had been overturned by judges in the Court of Appeal.
He is accused of playing a key role in a Europe-wide terror cell which recruited Islamic extremists to fight jihad in Iraq and Afghanistan, possibly against British and American forces.
Judges also banned naming the Tunisian - identified in legal documents by the initials MK - who was first extradited from Britain to Italy in 2008 to face terror charges but was acquitted last year.
A senior officer with the Genoa carabinieri special operations unit, one of Italy's main counter-terrorism teams, said MK was the subject of a three year investigation which involved monitoring telephone calls made from Italy to him in England.

"When he was arrested in Manchester a significant amount of material used for forging documents was found in his house and buried in the garden - the forged documents were of a very high quality," said the marshall, who declined to be named.

"We remain convinced he was in touch with people who had contacts in Iraq and Afghanistan with terrorist cells.

"From my experience of him and the investigation he certainly had an intricate and particular knowledge of terrorism but as I say after four years it is difficult to say now if he was dangerous but at the time he was and so that is why we are appealing.''

And an Italian security source said: "During the investigation we bugged some private and public premises and we are now developing transcripts of those Arabic conversations that were bugged.

"Some of those conversations were bugged in the immigration detention facility during the case in court. The latest ones involve MK and we intend to use them as evidence in our appeal."

He said MK was believed to be a "key figure" in the terror organisation which was under investigation.
"MK was eventually convicted of being with false documentation and a number of rubber stamps, false paperwork and items to make forgeries were found in the garden of the house where he was arrested in England.

"We were disappointed that he was acquitted along with the others but we are in the process of appealing that sentence. I strongly believe that at that moment in time MK was a significant terrorist figure," he said.
Italian prosecutors will allege MK was involved in an extremist group inspired by a secret militant branch of the radical international Muslim group Hizb ut-Tahrir.

MK, who is in his 50s, was arrested in a dawn raid by Greater Manchester Police in November 2007, along with 17 other suspects in Italy and other European countries.

Poisons and ignition devices were seized at addresses in a number of northern Italian cities.

MK was acquitted of terrorist charges in a Milan court in July last year but convicted of falsely procuring a document. Because of time spent on remand he did not have to serve a further sentence and was arrested at London City Airport the following month.

Judges ruled he had a right to stay in Britain to appeal against the Home Secretary's decision.
A preliminary hearing in the Italian prosecutors' appeal was heard last week and a full hearing against MK is due to take place at the Corte d'Assise d'Appello in July.

The operation of the Italian legal system means the court can not only overturn MK's acquittal but also convict him of the charges.

Upon any conviction, Italian authorities will apply for a new warrant to extradite MK to Italy from Britain, where they believe he is currently located, although the Home Office refused to discuss his whereabouts.

The development raises significant questions about the British Court of Appeal's handling of MK's case, and whether the Home Office and British security services have liaised adequately with their Italian counterparts.

The appeal judges' ruling made no mention of a possible retrial in the Italian courts. And because it is not known whether MK is under surveillance by MI5 and Special Branch, it is difficult to predict how easily British authorities could trace him if Italy requests his extradition for a second time.

The first extradition of MK took 12 months to complete after his lawyers brought a lengthy appeal under human rights laws. They claimed his removal to Italy would place him in danger of further extradition to Tunisia where he would be at risk of torture and ill-treatment.

A second extradition request would be likely to see MK's lawyers repeating their arguments under the European Convention on Human Rights.

Last night a Tunisian human rights lawyer said the Jasmine Revolution in January, which led to the ousting of the country's long-time dictator President Zine El Abidine Ben Ali, had cleared the way for MK and others to return to Tunisia.

Samir ben Amor, secretary of the Tunisian Association of Political Prisoners, said all political prisoners had been freed and their convictions set aside.

“This is a different country now. He can come back without any risk,” said Mr Ben Amor. “Hundreds of Tunisians in the same position have already come back from England and elsewhere.”

Mr Ben Amor’s statement significantly undermines MK’s claim to the British courts that he would face ill-treatment or persecution if deported from this country.

The Sunday Telegraph knows the identity of MK but has been prevented from disclosing it by the courts because he is an asylum seeker.

He came to Britain in 2001 and lived in Manchester with his wife and daughters. He had earlier been convicted in his absence of terrorist offences by a military court in Tunisia.

But his claim for asylum is likely to be based on being a member of an Islamist party in Tunisia which was banned before the regime was overthrown by this year's popular uprising - meaning it would have no grounds for success.

A Home Office spokesman said: "We do not comment on individual cases, but public protection is the first duty of government and there are strong measures in place to ensure national security."
 
 
 

Michigan U.S. reps call for Congress to reaffirm civil rights of Muslims

John Conyers
Rep. John Conyers (Photo: Lauren Victoria Burke/WDCPIX.COM)

 

By Eartha Jane Melzer
 
Detroit Congressmen John Conyers and Hansen Clark, both Democrats, have asked Congress to counter a general climate of bias against the American Muslim community by passing a resolution affirming the civil rights of Muslims.

“We believe that this sense of Congress is a logical step toward sending the message that the American Muslim community should be able to enjoy the rights guaranteed under the Constitution to the same extent as all other Americans,” said Conyers and Clarke.

“Communities should be protected from the threat of violence and suspicion that, for example, was at the heart of last January’s thwarted attack against the Islamic Center of America in Dearborn, Michigan. They should also be able to rely on law enforcement’s fundamental integrity and respect for First Amendments protected rights.”

“Ultimately, the American Muslim community should be able to rely on the federal government to lead the effort in fostering an open climate of understanding and cooperation. Only through a balanced examination of the challenges facing the nation will we establish a strong policy framework for protecting security, while respecting the Constitution and the interests of affected communities.”

This month the Department of Homeland Security announced it was opening an investigation into reports that federal agents have improperly detained and harassed Muslims at U.S.-Canada border crossings in Michigan.

The Council of American-Islamic Relations told the Detroit Free Press that Muslim Americans are questioned about their religious practices, subjected to humiliating searches, and kept in jail cells by border patrol agents for no legitimate reason.


http://www.americanindependent.com/186007/michigan-u-s-reps-call-for-congress-to-reaffirm-civil-rights-of-muslims

Pakistani Muslim rapist admits women have no rights or opinions in Islam

 

A practicing Muslim man raped and threatened a young Norwegian girl for several hours. Numerous rapes in Sweden over the past several years have been committed by "non-Western men," e.g., Muslims. In fact, in the past year, all rapes in Oslo have been committed by non-Western men.
"He said that he had the right to do exactly as he wanted to a woman. Why? Because that is how it was in his religion. Women did not have rights or opinions. He was in charge."
Islam teaches utter disrespect for women, who are mere possessions of savage men, to be raped whenever the beasts feel like it. At least this rapist admitted that fact of Islamic misogyny and sexism, which should be obvious to anyone with eyes to see.
"Women are your fields: go, then, into your fields whence you please." Quran 2:223
"Men have authority over women because God has made the one superior to the other, and because they spend their wealth to maintain them. Good women are obedient. They guard their unseen parts because God has guarded them. As for those from whom you fear disobedience, admonish them and forsake them in beds apart, and beat them." Quran 4:34
"A male shall inherit twice as much as a female." Quran 4:11

"Call in two male witnesses from among you, but if two men cannot be found, then one man and two women whom you judge fit to act as witnesses..." Quran 2:282

Berlusconi: "Arab Spring shows democracy compatible with Islam"

Big Pharma attempting to corner the market on medical marijuana

Veiled talk of American imperialism

Please respect FT.com's ts&cs and copyright policy which allow you to: share links; copy content for personal use; & redistribute limited extracts. Email ftsales.support@ft.com to buy additional rights or use this link to reference the article - http://www.ft.com/cms/s/2/1f4876bc-8a26-11e0-beff-00144feab49a.html#ixzz1NnEro1Eo

 

Review by Christopher Caldwell


The historian Eric Hobsbawm once wrote of his fascination that fashion designers “sometimes succeed in anticipating the shape of things to come better than professional predictors”. If you could say why a few women under the influence of the Egyptian Muslim Brotherhood began donning the veil half a century ago, just as historians, sociologists and politicians were pronouncing its obsolescence, then you could explain a lot about Islam today and about the west’s conflicts with it. This is what Leila Ahmed, an Egyptian-born professor at Harvard Divinity School, aims to do in a book that traces the meanings of the Muslim veil from postwar Egypt to the present-day US.

The hijab and the forms of Islamic dress you see on the street in Egypt are the uniform of Islamism, or political Islam – and they are an innovation. “These were not styles that the women’s mothers or grandmothers had ever donned,” Ahmed writes. She correctly poses the central question – whether women choose to dress this way or are forced to. She never, alas, arrives at an answer. On the one hand, she notes, sociologists in the 1970s gathered a lot of highly personal rationales from veil wearers. On the other, male Islamists saw the veil as vital to their political projects, and even subsidised it.

Out of that same mix of Saudi money and Brotherhood networks and doctrine grew the major Muslim organisations in the US – the Muslim Student Association and the Islamic Society of North America in the 1960s, the Council on American-Islamic Relations in the 1990s. The second half of the book describes how Islamist groups, particularly Isna, evolved after the terrorist attacks of September 11 2001.

“Whereas once working on this subject had meant burying myself in libraries and reading obscure articles, now I followed the most significant events and publications on the topic by following the news,” Ahmed writes. It shows. The Egyptian chapters draw on the accounts of historians and sociologists. The American ones recount a bunch of five- and six-year-old political squabbles. The veil drifts out of view almost completely.

Ahmed has a political axe to grind. She believes the theme of the “oppression of women in Islam” – always in quotation marks – serves an ideology, and that that ideology is imperialism. Criticisms from such feminists as Azar Nafisi, Irshad Manji and Ayaan Hirsi Ali are a “rearticulation in native voice of the imperialist theses about the inferiority of Islam”, she believes. Deplorably, Ahmed refuses to engage these writers’ arguments directly, hiding behind accusations and epithets that earlier adversaries have flung at them.

The Islamists of Isna, Ahmed argues, have developed a better way of addressing such issues. She is struck by the Islamist background of Muslim political activists of almost all persuasions. They dominate discussions not just of religious themes but of liberation struggles – and not just of women but of gays. But mostly, she believes, by pressing for more recognition of Islam, they are making the country better. They are “assimilating into the American tradition of protest and activism” that respects the “heritage of social struggle in the name of justice”.

Ahmed has not thought this out. There is an American heritage of protest, sure. Every country has one. But by definition, protest is not the main part of any country’s identity. You might as well expect to be welcomed in France for wanting to assimilate into its tradition of regicide. What is special about the US’s protest tradition is the moral legitimacy lent it, across centuries, by the special cruelty of slavery. This is not a legitimacy to which a group of newcomers can simply lay claim. Gestures that Ahmed presents as contributions to American political culture – for example, the Isna speaker who says that the US needs the Muslim message in order that it “not be remembered in history as a technological giant but a moral pygmy” – will appear to many Americans as signs of contempt

The writer is an FT columnist