Monday, October 3, 2011

U.S. met with Egypt Islamists - U.S. diplomat

CAIRO (Reuters) - U.S. officials met members of the Muslim Brotherhood's political party, a U.S. diplomat said, after Washington announced it would have direct contacts with Egypt's biggest Islamist group whose role has grown since U.S. ally Hosni Mubarak was ousted.
Washington announced the plans in June, portraying such contacts as the continuation of an earlier policy. But analysts said it reflected a new approach to the way it dealt with a group which Mubarak banned from politics.

The Brotherhood is one of Egypt's most popular and organised groups, with a broad grassroots network built up partly through social work even in Mubarak's era.

The contacts may unsettle Israel and its U.S. backers. The Brotherhood renounced violence as a means to achieve political change in Egypt years ago. But groups like Hamas, which have not disavowed violence, look to the Brotherhood as a spiritual guide.

Under the previous policy, U.S. diplomats were allowed to deal with the Brotherhood's members of parliament who had won seats as "independents" to skirt the official ban. This provided a diplomatic cover to keep lines of communication open.

"We have had direct contacts with senior officials of the Freedom and Justice party," the senior diplomat told Reuters, referring to the Brotherhood's party that was founded after politics opened up following the ouster of Mubarak.

The diplomat said U.S. officials did not make a distinction between members of the Brotherhood or its party. "We don't have a policy that makes a distinction, that one or the other is off limits," he said, without saying when the meetings took place.

The diplomat was responding to a question about whether any meetings had occurred, after Freedom Justice Party Chairman Mohamed Mursi told Egypt's Al-Dostour newspaper last week that U.S. officials had not made contact since the policy shift.

Speaking to Reuters on Sunday, the party deputy head Essam el-Erian also denied any meetings had taken place with U.S. officials when asked about the diplomat's comments.

It was not immediately clear why the two sides gave different accounts.


'HIGH-LEVEL' MEETINGS

Under the former Egyptian president, the Brotherhood was banned and its members often detained. Mubarak often presented himself as the bulwark preventing Egypt's slide into Islamist hands, an approach that analysts said help secure him backing from Washington and other Western powers wary that Egypt could turn into another Iran or Gaza.

The group took a backseat in the early part of the anti-Mubarak uprising, which was broadly led by youth groups who put national concerns above religion. But the Brotherhood and its party have taken a increasingly prominent role since.

The diplomat said the U.S. contacts had been with "high-level" members of the Brotherhood's party but did not give names. From the U.S. side, he said the contacts were not at ambassadorial level but he did not give further details.

"We had occasionally had these contacts in the past ... The difference is in the past we had seen parliamentarians," he said.

Egypt's parliament was dissolved after Mubarak's fall. Fresh elections for the lower house are due to start in November, with a vote for the upper house early next year.

The Brotherhood is expected to perform well in the vote, although many analysts expect a fairly fragmented parliament with no single unified voice emerging.

The diplomat said contacts with the Brotherhood were part of an effort to understand Egypt better and explain U.S. policies.

"From our perspective it is important to be in touch with all of the emerging political forces here in Egypt, across the board, that are peaceful and committed to non-violence," he said.

"It helps to understand Egypt and the way the political system is developing, and it helps us to deliver our message and get them to understand where we are coming from," he added.

(Additional reporting by Tamim Elyan; Editing by Rosalind Russell)

“Name one thing I can do on my property without your permission?”

 
Posted by Dr. Rich Swier

There is a growing movement in Florida and across America to address local government control over private property. The movement goes by the name “Agenders”. Agenders have been successful in getting local county and city commissioners to understand what Agenda 21 is and how it impacts individual property owners. Agenders are educating elected officials on how Agenda 21 has been gradually implemented locally by the International Council for Local Environmental Initiatives (ICLEI).

The operative words are “sustainable development”.

If you see the words sustainable development (smart growth, sustainability) used by local government officials then they are in fact implementing the ICLEI agenda. ICLEI sustainable development rules are designed to implement globally a new system of justice and a new system of economics, while pretending to use the environment as every society’s central organizing principle.

According to a September 28, 2011 column by Tom DeWeese of NewsWithViews.com, “Plantation, Florida has just voted to NOT renew its ICLEI contract. That’s the eighth community in eight months to take such action. Plantation joins the growing list that includes Carroll County, MD; Amador County, CA; Edmond, OK; Las Cruces, NM; Spartanburg, SC and Albemarle, VA.”

Just because an ICLEI membership is cancelled does not mean that the ideology behind it has gone away.

Many city and county commissioners still hold on to the idea that controlling your and my property is the best way to save the environment. Sarasota, FL has its fair share of these. Tom reports, [T]he following facts are certainly true and need to be understood by all anti-Agenda 21 activists:

1. ICLEI is a UN NGO organization that helped write Agenda 21 for the 1992 Earth Summit and then set, as its mission, to bring Agenda 21 policy to every city in the world.

2. It does this by meeting with local officials, signing contracts with them to set standards for energy and water use, building and development codes, farming policy, etc.

3. It brings in training for city hall staff; soft ware to manage the programs; guidelines for legislation; networking with other communities, other NGO and Stakeholder groups and other agencies of state and federal government.

4. They reach out to other public officials in the communities, including newspaper editors, school superintendents, local college presidents, and chamber of commerce leaders – all designed to assure everyone who helps make decisions and policy in the community are on board.

5. And of course, ICLEI leads the officials to the most important ingredient to impose Agenda 21 – money – grant money that comes with specific strings to guarantee that Agenda 21 is enforced.

So how are Agenders winning the local battle against a well funded and well organized global group like ICLEI?

Tom notes, “[F]ocus on the victims and the impact the policy will have on the well being of the community and you. Question how they intend to enforce the policy (such as having government agents come into your home). Make your officials explain that. They won’t want to. This will show the heavy hand of control required to make the policy work. Put the officials on the defensive over their enforcement efforts and watch them retreat as it’s exposed. The same approach can be used effectively in dealing with plans to put meters on private wells, or in dealing with plans for historic preservation schemes that suddenly disallow private property owners to change or improve anything on their house…”

Finally Tom says the best question to ask your city or county commissioner is the title of this column.

Knowledge is power and understanding what sustainable development really means is critical. Educate, motivate and activate your local elected officials. Ask them to stop the taking of your and my property rights. Instead ask them to protect our unalienable right to do with our property as we, not they, will.

Could medical marijuana provide tax dollars for cities?

Could medical marijuana provide tax dollars for cities?

Michigan Airmen deploy to Afghanistan

 
From: macombdaily.com
More than 300 Michigan Airmen and about a dozen aircraft are now on duty in Afghanistan. The
"Some of the finest men and women in Michigan will call Afghanistan home for the next several months and will play an integral role in bringing peace and stability to the Afghan people," said Col. Michael Thomas, commander of the 127th Wing at Selfridge Air National Guard Base, the home station for the Airmen who deployed.

Deployed to Kandahar Airfield, a NATO base in southern Afghanistan, are personnel from the 107th Fighter Squadron, the 127th Operations Group and the 127th Maintenance Group. Included in the group are pilots, aircrew life support specialists and a wide range of aircraft maintenance personnel, with specialties running from engines and avionics to fuels and weapons systems. For several of the senior members of the deployment, this is their fourth major overseas deployment since Sept. 11, 2001. The deployment is expected to last about four months, with a number of Airmen serving an additional 1-2 months in Afghanistan.

Moving the group to Afghanistan represented a Herculean task that touched not only all parts of the 127th Wing, but showcased the teamwork of the Total Force focus that exists across the Air Force, according to Master Sgt. Jerry Morgan, deployments noncommissioned officer in charge for the 127th Wing.

More than 300 Michigan Airmen and about a dozen aircraft are now on duty in Afghanistan. The deployment is the largest ever for the Michigan Air National Guard to Afghanistan.

"Some of the finest men and women in Michigan will call Afghanistan home for the next several months and will play an integral role in bringing peace and stability to the Afghan people," said Col. Michael Thomas, commander of the 127th Wing at Selfridge Air National Guard Base, the home station for the Airmen who deployed.

Deployed to Kandahar Airfield, a NATO base in southern Afghanistan, are personnel from the 107th Fighter Squadron, the 127th Operations Group and the 127th Maintenance Group. Included in the group are pilots, aircrew life support specialists and a wide range of aircraft maintenance personnel, with specialties running from engines and avionics to fuels and weapons systems. For several of the senior members of the deployment, this is their fourth major overseas deployment since Sept. 11, 2001. The deployment is expected to last about four months, with a number of Airmen serving an additional 1-2 months in Afghanistan.

Moving the group to Afghanistan represented a Herculean task that touched not only all parts of the 127th Wing, but showcased the teamwork of the Total Force focus that exists across the Air Force, according to Master Sgt. Jerry Morgan, deployments noncommissioned officer in charge for the 127th Wing.

Click here to read the full story: Michigan Airmen Deploy to Afghanistan

Ahmadinejad: Israelis should go back to original homes


Iranian president at 'Intifada Conference' says Palestinians should also "go home" and this would provide "simple solution" to solve conflict.